Sunday, November 30, 2008
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
This looks like a pretty shrewd pick, and the fact that it is the first cabinet job to be sort-of-announced is an indication that Barack Obama is in deadly earnest about one of his main campaign promises: comprehensive health-care reform. . . .
By appointing a big cheese to the health job, Mr Obama seems to be defying the gloomy view that the state of the economy rules out such an expensive initiative. His proposed plan has been costed at anything from $50 billion to $100 billion a year, which many people argue can not be afforded in the current environment. He could, of course, make the opposite case. The deepening recession is likely to have dreadful consequences in health-care terms, as people lose their jobs and the health insurance that goes with them, and as companies scale back or even abandon the packages they offer their workers. So reform is more urgently needed than ever.
In addition, there is such widespread agreement on the need for fiscal stimulus at the levels of hundreds of billions that it might, paradoxically, become politically easier to slip another large programme into the mix, especially one that benefits ordinary people rather than bankers. Last, stressed American companies are actively backing radical reform, because the burden of health insurance costs is crippling their ability to compete abroad. In the early 1990s, they opposed it, and helped to kill it off.
This last observation is perhaps crucial -- American business is crippled by its health care obligations. A comprehensive and universal federal program could make American business more competitive and might even reduce the incentive to send jobs abroad. If businessmen pressure Congress for reform, that may at last make it happen. The time is right, and the rhetorical forces that have stalled reform may now be aligned to create change.
The photograph that accompanies the article in The Economist abstracts Tom Daschle in the act of speaking, with an operation apparently in progress behind him. The positioning places him in the apparent role of speaking for doctors, nurses, and patients--a switch on the traditional opposition of the American medical and insurance establishment to universal health insurance.
See "A Shrewd Choice: Can Tom Daschle and Barack Obama Fix American Health Care?" The Economist, 21 November 2008.
photo credit: AP, from The Economist
Monday, November 24, 2008
For those interested in rhetoric and free speech issues. I will be putting this on my reading list.
Sunday, November 23, 2008
Roberto Saviano is the author of Gomorrah, a book about the Neapolitan mafia, now a motion picture.
The BBC has an interesting story about the situation in Naples, with hints that the code of silence is under pressure from citizens who are no longer willing to put up with "the system."
"The Camorra grows rich on silence," says Judge Franco Roberti.Saviano is under guard. The Camorra threatens that he will be dead before Christmas.
BBC News, "Breaking Camorra's Silence Code," 21 November 2008. Photo: BBC.
See also Alexander Stille, Excellent Cadavers: The Mafia and the Death of the First Italian Republic; Leonardo Sciascia, The Moro Affair; Norman Lewis, Naples '44: A World War Two Diary of Occupied Italy; Le Mani Sulla Citta (1963; Hands Over the City) by Francesco Rosi, with Rod Steiger; Rachel Donadio, "Underworld," New York Times, 27 November 2007 (review). IMDB on Gomorrah; movie site and trailer.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Today is the 45th anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas -- 22 November 1963.
From the President's diary, online at JFK Library.
See exhibit at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. See also John F. Kennedy, "Remarks Intended for Delivery to the Texas Democratic State Committee at the Municipal Auditorium in Austin," 22 November 1963, at the American Presidency Project.
History seemed to go crazily off track on that sad day 45 years ago.
Photo credit: John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston, Massachusetts. Public domain.
UNIVERSITY PARK — As spiraling trails of orange fire punctured Thursday night's sky, a frightened flock of southbound crows sparked quips about droppings from passers-by.
You've got to watch out for those passersby -- they cannot be trusted.
Lauren Boyer, "Penn State: Curbing the Crows; Armed and Noisy: Crew Fires Noisemakers to Scare Birds Away," Centre Daily Times [State College, PA], 21 November 2008.
Friday, November 21, 2008
During his presidency, FDR gave two speeches at Gettysburg, in 1934 and 1938. I've been remembering them this week, since November 19 is the anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address.
YouTube has video transfers of some newsreels made on the occasion of FDR's speech at Gettysburg on July 4, 1938, the 75th anniversary of the battle. Reading the speeches now, it is possible to see how, all those years after the end of the Civil War, Roosevelt is still working to re-unite the country. The veterans on that occasion, old men who returned for their last reunion, seemed willing to shake hands and meet as friends. All these years later, 80 years after Roosevelt's 1938 speech at the dedication of a peace memorial on the Gettysburg battlefield, the first comments on the YouTube posting of Roosevelt's speech wave the banner of the lost cause bitter-enders, still not ready for peace.
For more on FDR's 1934 and 1938 Gettysburg speeches, see -- Thomas W. Benson, "FDR at Gettysburg: The New Deal and the Rhetoric of Presidential Leadership," The Rhetoric of Presidential Leadership, ed. Leroy Dorsey (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2002), 145-183.
Steven Heller interviews Sol Sender, designer of the "O" sign, in the New York Times, 20 November 2008.
Obama campaign logos can be downloaded from the campaign web site. Sol Sender comments that one of the advantages of a good logo design is that it can be adapted to a variety of uses -- here are some examples from the Obama campaign site. I suppose seeing all these images together, and there are still others, gives some sense of the targeted campaigning, and the possibly fragmented result, of modern campaigning. On the other hand, there is a latent appeal here for convergence and perhaps unity, since these images are not solely appeals from the campaign to its audiences, but also images that can be downloaded or purchased, and then displayed on windows, car bumpers, tee shirts, and so on, so that the message seems to be going not simply CAMPAIGN--> VOTER but VOTER--> VOTER.
Q: What were you thinking when you conceived this idea?A: When we received the assignment, we immediately read both of Senator Obama’s books. We were struck by the ideas of hope, change and a new perspective on red and blue (not red and blue states, but one country). There was also a strong sense, from the start, that his campaign represented something entirely new in American politics — “a new day,” so to speak.
The voter-to-voter effect is perhaps given more power not only by the sophisticated design, but also by the sense that many others are sharing the same appeal. On the other hand, the sense that this is part of a much larger movement may be for some viewers dimished by the sense that the grass roots may instead be made of astroturf.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
If you are interested in the intersection of rhetoric and computers, this might interest you. And if you're not, what are you doing here?
Jeff Zeleny has written a fascinating piece in the New York Times on what it might mean for Barack Obama to give up his Blackberry phone and email. The information world of a president is crucial to every person in the world. The president has access to all sorts of information denied to the rest of us, but is cut off from much ordinary communication by "the bubble" -- a zone of security, privacy, and protection that can also push presidents into a place where they are entirely out of touch with the ordinary life of everyday persons.
Obama might be the first president, writes Zeleny, to have a laptop computer on his desk in the Oval Office.
Jeff Zeleny, "Say Goodbye to BlackBerry? Yes He Can, Maybe," New York Times, 15 November 2008.
photo: BlackBerry Storm from BlackBerry
Robert K. Landers, "Learning for Everyone," Wall Street Journal, 10 November 2008.
Given what has happened to the study of the humanities in the past two decades -- with theory and politics playing a larger role and fewer people reading the traditional canon -- it is hard not to feel a bit nostalgic for Great Books earnestness. In academe, there is only what might be regarded as a saving remnant: "Among major universities, only Columbia, where the whole idea began" -- around the time of World War I, long before the mania erupted in Chicago -- "still force-feeds a much-abbreviated version of the Great Books curriculum to its undergraduates," Mr. Beam notes. "Tiny St. John's College, created by disciples of Hutchins and Adler, still devotes all four years to teaching the Great Books, as Hutchins vainly hoped the University of Chicago would do."
Molly Rothenberg, a student at St. John's in Annapolis, Md., told Mr. Beam of comparing notes when she was a sophomore with a fellow graduate of the public high school in Cambridge, Mass. St. John's sophomores study works by such authors as Aristotle, Tacitus and Shakespeare. Her friend was attending Bates College in Maine. "She told me they were studying Rhetoric," Ms. Rothenberg said, "and they would be watching episodes of 'Desperate Housewives' and listening to Eminem. They were going to analyze it. I just laughed. What could I say?"
The Great Books movement endures as a foundation. St. John's College in Annapolis is not too traditional to be on the Internet; you can look up the philosophy and the curriculum for St. John's, and its current reading lists. Columbia College of Columbia University in New York provides an online description of its core curriculum.
Friday, November 14, 2008
You can download Google Earth free here.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Predictions that Russia will again become powerful, rich and influential ignore some simply devastating problems at home that block any march to power. Sure, Russia's army could take tiny Georgia. But Putin's military is still in tatters, armed with rusting weaponry and staffed with indifferent recruits. Meanwhile, a declining population is robbing the military of a new generation of soldiers. Russia's economy is almost totally dependent on the price of oil. And, worst of all, it's facing a public health crisis that verges on the catastrophic.Does it matter? It certainly matters to Russia, but our national leaders have perhaps not been clear about what it might mean to the United States and to other nations near and far. In the recent elections, John McCain made war-like and nationalistic hay out of the Russian invasion of Georgia, though he let the matter slide as it became clearer to those who took an interest that our client in Georgia had probably been tacitly encouraged to take stupid risks on the border regions with Russia. Russia behaved badly, but so did Georgia and the United States, though not in equal measure.
But the challenge to the next president is not merely rhetorical. Russia is a nuclear power, perhaps more dangerous to the world when it is collapsing than during the long stalemate of the Cold War. It will be interesting to see how diplomatic and public rhetoric are managed in the presidency of Barack Obama.
By a strange turn of associations, I was in Moscow in December 1991, the month the Soviet Union collapsed. I had been asked to travel there to consult with the Soviet Academy of Sciences--which became the Russian Academy of Sciences in the days we were there. Peter Olenik of Princeton and I were sent by the Carnegie Foundation and IREX to encourage the institutes of the Academy to install computers with modems that could connect their scholars to each other and especially to other countries. Not only the Soviet state but also the Soviet economy were collapsing. The ruble was nearly worthless and hard currency was simply not available to buy books, journal subscriptions, or plane tickets to international conferences. Carnegie had funded a project led by Michael Cole of University of California, San Diego, to experiment with person-to-person email connections between Russia and the United States, and our visit was part of the transition of that effort as Russia emerged from the rule of Communism and the Soviet empire. The idea was to form a culture of open cooperation and mutual trust.
It is very sad to see what has happened since those optimistic days.
Murray Feshbach, "Behind the Bluster, Russia Is Collapsing," Washington Post, 5 October 2008.
Gary Gumpert, firstname.lastname@example.org
I am sad to report the death of professor, singer, social activist Forbes I. Hill on November 5, 2008. Mercifully he was aware and gratified before leaving us that Barak Obama was elected the 44TH president of the United States.
I was a long-time colleague of Forbes Hill at Queens College of the City University of New York. We both arrived at this unique city university in the 1960s. I knew him as a scholar with degrees from San Diego State University, the University of Oregon, and Cornell University. We shared the "sturm and drang" of a changing discipline and a time of social upheaval. I came from the "media" silo and Forbes from the tradition of "rhetoric." It was an exciting time of academic change that would shape the communication discipline for the 21st century. We shared Aristotle, but argued about the importance of media upon the new rhetoric. We both taught in a large multi-media lecture room enjoying and being stimulated by the magic of the energized and socially conscious students of that time. I saw Forbes change and absorb and reflect the changing times and field.
While a long time colleague, I have become aware that I only knew a portion of the man. I knew he was a passionate singer, and political activist. He was one of the founding faces of the Professional Staff Congress, the professors' union of the City University of New York. He was chairman of the Queens College chapter. We shared the anti-war sentiments of the 70's but I was unaware of the extent and depth of his social and political conscience.
We found out about Forbes death when one of my colleagues noticed his obituary in the New York Times. We had been aware of Forbes' long and dignified battle with prostate cancer. That story was reported in the New York Times last November. "Mr. Hill seems ready for a time when treating his cancer is no longer the right approach, replaced instead by a focus on preparing for the end of his life." His courage and relationship to community emerged in the interfaith memorial tribute held at the Plymouth Church of the Pilgrims held in Brooklyn on November 9th. It was a moving testament to a long and meaningful life.
It was a time to remember a colleague and to learn more about what we did not know. The biographical information included in the memorial program told of Forbes growing up in California and his long college years during which he picked cherries, worked in the cannery and roamed around the country during which time he "met all kinds of people, from migrant laborers to fellow intellectuals. During this period he became active in progressive politics and causes." Forbes was born in 1928 and something that one of his three children or his wife Lynn mentioned in their eloquent comments caught my attention and upon returning home inspired me search the New York Times archives for mention of my former colleague.
A 1948 news item reported that "five campaign workers for Henry A. Wallace reported tonight that a band of men had dragged them from their headquarters here, and drove them ten miles out of town where they were released with a warning to 'stay out of Augusta'...Forbes Hill, 23 years old, had a black eye and a torn shirt and two of the women showed bruises when they reported the incident at Grovestown, GA., fifteen miles west of this city."
How much do we know about each other before it is too late?
November 11, 2008, Number 10645
Communication Research and Theory Network a service of the National Communication Association www.natcom.org/CRTNET
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
In Flanders Fields
In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.
We are the dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.
Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Paul Krugman, "Franklin Delano Obama," New York Times, 10 November 2008.
Here is the Los Angeles Times report:
Berlusconi, who has a history of controversial remarks, said the relative youth of Russian President , and Obama should make it easier for Moscow and Washington to work together.
Then, smiling, he said through an interpreter, "I told the president that he [Obama] has everything needed in order to reach deals with him: He's young, handsome and even tanned."
Medvedev did not visibly react.
Italy's only black lawmaker, Jean-Leonard Touadi, called the comment embarrassing.
Carla Bruni, wife of French Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, was born an Italian citizen and became a French citizen when she married Sarkozy earlier this year. When she learned of Berlusconi's comments, she said that she was glad she had become French.
Los Angeles Times, "Foreign chiefs have funny way of offering congrats; Berlusconi says Obama is 'handsome and even tanned.' Ahmadinejad slams U.S. policies," 7 November 2008.
Alexander Stille, Letter from Rome, "Girls! Girls! Girls! The P.M.'s Sex Follies," The New Yorker, 3 November 2008, 70-76.
Sunday, November 9, 2008
That debate also takes the form of an argument about whether President-elect Obama should start with large moves or small ones; it was argued in these terms by David Brooks and Paul Krugman in the New York Times on Friday, 7 November 2008. And then there's the argument urging the new president do nothing and get out of the way of the market; the case is put by Andrew Wilson in "Five Myths about the Great Depression," Wall Street Journal, 4 November 2008 (if you buy his argument I'm guessing you did not vote for Barack Obama on November 4).
These issues are presented to us as doubly rhetorical. They are rhetorical in that they are presented to us as arguments for one course or another as issues of policy. They are also rhetorical in the sense that choosing the order of the agenda and small versus large moves has not only technical but also rhetorical dimensions, since each move creates the new rhetorical situation and the climate of opinion in which the next move can be addressed.
graphic credit: AP, in The Economist, 7 November 2008.
Katrina Vanden Heuvel, "The First 100 Days," The Nation blog, 7 November 2008.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Americans -- and the American press -- have celebrated the election of Barack Obama on Tuesday night, and by the next day they wanted him to take charge. Weeks ago, Daniel Schorr, a great figure in American journalism, expressed the longing that if Obama were elected he should immediately be welcomed as a partner by the current occupant so that he could get to work on change. Schorr obviously did not expect that to happen, but did suggest that perhaps we should move up inauguration day. Joe Nocera in the Times, in the story that accompanies Doug Mills's photograph, also expresses the widespread impatience for the president-elect to act, and act now.
It is of course Constitutionally inappropriate for a president-elect to start governing until inauguration day. Herbert Hoover tried hard to get Franklin D. Roosevelt to join him in economic and financial planning before inauguration, but Roosevelt quite properly would not be drawn. In those days, the wait was even longer, as inauguration was not until March 4. The change to January 20 came in a Constitutional amendment before Roosevelt's second inauguration.
On the other hand, in 2000, the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore, which infamously declared the recount over, thus making George W. Bush president, despite his loss by more than 500,000 votes in the popular election and the fact of still-uncounted votes in Florida, came on December 12 -- giving George Bush too little time for adequate transition planning.
Americans may be forgiven for not being Constitutional scholars -- but Barack Obama actually is a Constitutional scholar, and he seems to understand well the nuances of presidential action. His repeated reminder during yesterday's press conference that he is not yet president, while still indicating his preferences on some policy matters, seemed a reasonable attempt to balance the Constitutional proprieties and the urgencies of public expectations.
Perhaps our ever-shortening news cycle and our saturation in the images of the campaign have helped us forget that there are schedules other than those of cable TV news and the Internet. We're about to get a reminder, and it already seems like a long wait. It will be interesting to see how the Obama campaign manages the problem of visibility versus Constitutional reticence as these 75 days before the first 100 days tick away.
photo credit: Doug Mills, New York Times, 8 November 2008.
Joe Nocera, "Talking Business -- 75 Years Later, a Nation Hopes for Another FDR," New York Times, 8 November 2008.
Friday, November 7, 2008
I stumbled on the site and found myself writing this spontaneously
I hope for a country at peace, with widely shared prosperity and a commitment to accessible health care for all, accessible higher education, and open, transparent government that leads with both action and clearly argued commitments.
I hope for a country where the fellow putting a new floor in our 35-year old house doesn't have to lose a tooth because he could not afford the $700 that a root canal, which would have saved the tooth, would cost him and his family.
I hope for a country that can provide support that honors the commitment of Nancy C., whom I drove to the polls on election day to vote for Barack Obama after she had spent six hours in chemotherapy and was exhausted and in pain.
I hope for a country where the college students in my classes at Penn State can graduate from college without massive debts that will hold them down for decades, shaping their career choices and limiting their lives when they could otherwise be doing more to serve the public good.
I have high hopes for relief, recovery, and real reform.
Congratulations on this magnificent campaign and this historic election; now let's roll up our sleeves and get to work.
Penn State University
Why not tell them what's on your mind at Change.gov
This could be highly useful -- but perhaps it could also be a way of institutionalizing the permanent campaign.
Tell us your reactions.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
And then there is Sarah Palin's speech on Tuesday night. The one that did not get delivered.
The New York Times reports today on the contention between McCain and Palin that ran through the campaign--the clothes, the Couric interview, the refusals to be guided by the campaign.
But behind those episodes may be a greater subtext: anger within the McCain camp that Ms. Palin harbored political ambitions beyond 2008.
As late as Tuesday night, a McCain adviser said, Ms. Palin was pushing to deliver her own speech just before Mr. McCain’s concession speech, even though vice-presidential nominees do not traditionally speak on election night. But Ms. Palin met up with Mr. McCain with text in hand. She was told no by Mark Salter, one of Mr. McCain’s closest advisers, and Steve Schmidt, Mr. McCain’s top strategist.
There was a moment in McCain's gracious speech when he thanked Sarah Palin and suggested she had a bright future; one could see Todd Palin give Governor Palin a look of acknowledgment and satisfaction--and it looked to me as if she was giving him a wink and a nod of confirmation.
Elisabeth Bumiller, "Internal Battles Divided McCain and Palin Camps," New York Times, 6 November 2008.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
photo from Bag News Notes.
The sight of Jesse Jackson weeping in Grant Park inevitably brings back memories for those who were alive forty years ago of the hopes and fears of the Civil Rights era, and of other images of that time. In April we saw the fortieth anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., in Memphis. Here are Hosea Williams, Jesse Jackson, Martin Luther King, Ralph David Abernathy at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, 3 April 1968, the day before King was killed.
Memphis, 4 April 1968
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Somewhere in central Pennsylvania
YOUNG MALE VOICE: Is Megan there?
ME: Sorry, there's no Megan here. That's the second time today someone's asked for her, so you may have a problem in your database.
YMV: I'm trying to reach Megan Benson. For the McCain campaign?
ME: Sorry, no Megan here, but we're Bensons, too.
YMV: Well, I'm calling for the McCain campaign. Did you vote today? For John McCain?
ME: No, we actually voted for Barack Obama.
YMV: Oh, too bad.
ME: Well, when it's all over in a few hours either McCain or Obama will have won, and you and I will both still be Americans, and we'll get on with it.
YMV: I'm not so sure about that.
YMV: I don't want to live in a country where people's money is taken in taxes that then go to benefits for other people.
ME: Sure you do.
ME: We've had a graduated income tax in this country for a hundred years; you believe in it, Barack Obama believes in it, I believe in it, and John McCain believes in it.
YMV: Well, I've got to go make some more calls.
ME: Okay, thanks for calling. Think about it.
The Chancellor of Penn State's Altoona campus acted to secure the intervention of the county solicitor and sent the following letters to faculty and students on campus.
I write to ask that you be understanding and flexible with students who may have been late for class or missed class due to issues surrounding their attempts to vote today. There were two issues: 1) long lines and several hour waiting periods at the polls, and 2) several students were denied provisional ballots because their permanent address is outside of our area.
Thankfully, the County Solicitor gave a ruling this afternoon that appropriately affirmed students' right to vote via provisional ballot. I have emailed all students suggesting that if they were denied the right to vote that they return to the polling precinct to request the right to vote via provisional ballot. Please see below the email message I sent to students.
I thank you for your understanding.
For those of you who attempted to vote today but were denied because of residency issues, the County Solicitor has ruled that you are entitled to vote.
Please return to the polling precinct and resubmit your request to vote. You should be issued a provisional ballot to allow you to vote in today's election.
If there is any further question or issue that you encounter, please ask the Judge of Elections at the polling precinct to call Ms. Ingrid Healy, the Director of Elections, at 693-3287 for clarification and approval.
You may need to be assertive in this request, but do not hesitate to do so, because as an American citizen it is your right to vote.
Lori J. Bechtel-Wherry, Ph.D.
Lori J. Bechtel-Wherry, Ph.D.
Penn State Altoona
3000 Ivyside Park
Altoona, PA 16601
Monday, November 3, 2008
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Saturday, November 1, 2008
UPDATE -- On November 3, C-SPAN is broadcasting tape of a McCain town hall in Peterborough, New Hampshire from yesterday, November 2. He seems relaxed and direct, and even was willing to differ somewhat from a questioner on a clean-coal issue (McCain said he would invest in clean coal, but would build coal plants now). Granted, were McCain to say this in Pennsylvania--and he has been saying it in Pennsylvania--he might be accused of pandering, but my sense just catching the question and answer exchange at a glance from Peterborough was that the citizen was advocating for clean technologies. So, at least there was something like a conversation and an airing of pros and cons. Where has this McCain been for the past two months?
Rome, Italy. La Repubblica today --
Elezioni americane, -3. Il democratico si rivolge agli elettori. Ed è alle prese con la notizia di una zia clandestina che vive a Boston. Negli stati a rischio le ultime tappe della campagna elettorale. I sondaggi dicono che il senatore nero è sempre in vantaggio. Secondo Zogby, McCain si è avvicinatoExcelsior - Mexico City, Mexico --
Le Monde, Paris, France today --
Elections américaines : la fiabilité
des instituts de sondage en questionPeut-il perdre ? Les sondages peuvent-ils à ce point se tromper ? Ces interrogations peuvent paraître incongrues, tant tous pronostiquent une victoire du candidat démocrate Barack Obama à l'élection présidentielle du 4 novembre, même si la marge s'est un peu réduite en octobre.
The Irish Times, Ireland
The Guardian, United Kingdom --
McCain, Obama sweep battleground states in final push
Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama battled today in states that voted Republican in 2004 in the final, frenetic weekend of a long and grinding US presidential election campaign.Mr McCain was in Virginia looking to turn out the vote on Tuesday in a state that normally votes Republican but appears to be siding with Mr Obama.
Editorial: The US stands on the threshold of the new era it needs. Americans should elect Barack Obama
It turned out to be a push poll for John McCain, with accusations about gay marriage, guns, Fannie May . . . and then I hung up.
They called from 703-263-1345
the whocalledus site identifies this number as Natl Poler 08 operating under various names involving the phrase "pro life."
We've just been informed by a highly reliable source that an internal Republican poll of Pennsylvania's Fifth Congressional district, a "safe Republican" district for decades, is now showing a tie between Republican Glenn Thompson and Democrat Mark McCracken.
Thompson has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the campaign. The district has been so safely Republican that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee did not send money to McCracken, who has spent almost nothing on the campaign.
This would be a historic upset for the largest Congressional in Pennsylvania.